Welcome to Cigsee.com - Cigarettes Shop

Heavy taxes and permanent restrictions turn smoker’s life into a real nightmare. The prices on cigarettes go up with every year. Cigsee.com is an exclusive discount cigarette online store that makes smokers’ life a bit easier. We sell cigarettes at lowest prices on the Internet. Here you can find not only world famous brands such as Marlboro, Camel, Lucky Strike, Winston, L&M, Dunhill, Kent, Davidoff, but also non promoted East European brands. We sell only finest tobacco products at the cheapest prices. We take care about our customers. That is why we sell only high quality products. All cigarettes are genuine branded items, with all taxes paid. The delivery is carried out in the shortest possible time. We also provide friendly 24/7 live customer support. We appreciate every our customer, so we want to ensure you that all information about our clients is kept in secret, that means we don’t report any information about our customers. We guarantee that you will get high quality cheap cigarettes Online, fast delivery, and excellent customer support. You will definitely enjoy being our customer. We pay personal attention to every cigarette order, no matter if it is big or small. We provide the best service on the Internet. 

Buy the world most desired cigarette brands via our online tobacco store. 

Glass Ashtrays

German insurance company KLA, which specializes in health insurance, the industry leader in the country, has launched a new social and outdoor advertising campaign on the fight against smoking. This is not about restricting smoking in public places or warnings beginner smokers, as is often the case in recent times, namely facilitating rid of this habit of smokers with the experience. In public places were installed glass ashtrays. But the fact is that they were manufactured in the form of human hearts and lungs. Thus, achieved maximum visibility with minimum effort on the part of advertising - passers-smokers themselves been complicit in the advertising process, while consumer advertising and live illustration. The effect is strong enough, given the inherently negative mood in German society in relation to smoking.

How cigarette design can affect youth initiation into smoking: Camel cigarettes 1983-93

ABSTRACT
Context: Internal industry documents may shed light on how cigarettes are designed to promote youth smoking.

Objective: To determine changes in the design of Camel cigarettes in the period surrounding the "Smooth Character" advertising campaign and to assess the impact of these changes on youth smoking.

Data sources: Internal documents made available through the document website maintained by RJ Reynolds, manufacturer of Camel cigarettes.

Study selection: Electronic searches using keywords to identify relevant data.

Data extraction: A web based index search of documents targeting "smoothness" or "harshness" and "younger adult smokers" ("YAS") or "first usual brand younger adult smokers" ("FUBYAS") in the 10 year period surrounding the introduction of the "Smooth Character" campaign was used to identify Camel related product design research projects. A snowball methodology was used: initial documents were identified by focusing on key words, codes, researchers, committees, meetings, and gaps in overall chronology; a second set of documents was culled from these initial documents, and so on.
Data synthesis: Product design research led to the introduction of redesigned Camel cigarettes targeted to younger adult males coinciding with the "Smooth Character" campaign. Further refinements in Camel cigarettes during the following five year period continued to emphasize the smoothness of the cigarette, utilizing additives and blends which reduced throat irritation but increased or retained nicotine impact.

Conclusions: Industry competition for market share among younger adult smokers may have contributed to the reversal of a decline in youth smoking rates during the late 1980s through development of products which were more appealing to youth smokers and which aided in initiation by reducing harshness and irritation.

Keywords: design; youth; initiation of smoking; Camel

Abbreviations: DAP, diammonium phosphate; FTC, Federal Trade Commission; FUBYAS, first usual brand younger adult smoker; RJR, RJ Reynolds; TSB, two stage blend; YAS, younger adult smoker

RJ Reynolds (RJR) was the leading US cigarette manufacturer throughout the 1960s and 1970s. However, the company's leading brand Winston experienced sales declines beginning as early as 1969 and continuing throughout the 1970s and early 1980s. RJR recognized as underlying this decline a shift in the preferences of younger smokers away from Winston and other RJR brands. During this same time period, Philip Morris grew from 9.5% to 31% of the overall market. This growth was due largely to the success of Marlboro, which had been repositioned during the 1950s and increased steadily in share beginning in 1966. By 1980 Marlboro had become the most popular cigarette among younger smokers, with approximately 40% of the 18 year old market. RJR was faced with not only a challenge for market leadership but also an aging consumer base.

A strategic analysis from January 1981 shows that RJR identified product design issues as a primary reason for this market shift.

"During the 1970s, RJR products and Philip Morris products diverged from each other in product and hence in smoke delivery characteristics. Because RJR's focus was satisfying the full flavor smoker, our products remained high in tar and nicotine with a stronger and harsher smoke delivery and more tobacco taste. In the meantime, PM products, decreasing in tar and nicotine delivery, gradually converted to a product which was milder, less harsh, and with less tobacco taste."

RJR instituted design changes in 1980 and 1981 that were intended to close this product gap, "as key factors contributing to product weakness were discovered in tar, nicotine, menthol, and moisture levels". Camel was repositioned to become the contemporary younger adult smoker (YAS) brand, taking direct aim at Marlboro, and its development was made one of RJR's top priorities. Marketing and product research initiatives directly targeting the YAS market were launched in 1983, influencing changes in Camel products through the remainder of the decade.
Youth smoking prevalence rates significantly increased during the early 1990s. Between 1991 and 1997, 30 day adolescent prevalence rates rose from 28% to 36%. Although initiation rates (those who have ever tried smoking) continued to decrease throughout the 1980s and early 1990s, prevalence of daily cigarette smoking increased at all grade levels among the classes of 1989, 1990, and 1991.

Prior analyses have linked this increase in prevalence to marketing and advertising. The introduction of the Camel "Smooth Character" marketing campaign in 1988 may have influenced this rate increase. Youth market share increased more significantly for Camel than for other popular youth brands (Marlboro, Newport) during this period. Joe Camel (Smooth Character) advertisements were also the most popular advertisements named in a 1993 adolescent survey. However, internal industry studies suggest that marketing campaigns, though successful in initiating occasional use, do not translate to increased market share for products that do not appeal to consumers. An analysis of the young adult marketed brand Magna is instructive: in this case, "[t]he brand successfully generates higher levels of occasional use but these smokers are as of yet unwilling to adopt MAGNA as their usual brand". This is attributed in part to "negative product perceptions lingering from trial prior to product improvement".

Transformation of Camel cigarettes into a brand favored by youth may have required product changes supporting increased initiation and uptake. Product changes would be anticipated to coincide with introduction of the Smooth Character advertising campaign. The research presented in this paper was prompted by the question of what product design changes, if any, may have influenced the uptake of youth smoking prevalence and increased brand market share for Camel in the period surrounding this campaign. Internal industry documents were used to gain insight into the effects of product design changes on Camel cigarettes and to understand the possible impact on youth smoking.

METHODS
This study examines design changes in Camel cigarettes for the five years before and after the introduction of the Smooth Character advertising campaign (1988). A preliminary, web based (index search of documents targeting "smoothness" or "harshness" and "younger adult smokers" ("YAS") or "first usual brand younger adult smoker" ("FUBYAS") provided an outline set of Camel related projects, including projects YAX, TSB, XG, and ZX (all grouped in the years preceding the campaign) and projects RU, SS, and EW (after the campaign). A snowball methodology was utilized: documents were targeted using relevant indexed keywords (for example, smoothness, harshness, perception, youth, product, design, blend, consumer, etc) and documents related to the projects identified above. The initial documents provided a secondary list of names of researchers, management, committees, and weekly and monthly committee meetings. Untitled documents were located using the identifying Bates number. Documents were reviewed for keywords, codes, or projects. Finally, the relevant documents were ordered chronologically and a search was performed for all Camel related documents in those month intervals that appeared as gaps in the overall chronology. The final set of relevant documents catalogued for this study number approximately 1000. Two researchers reviewed and analyzed this final study set.

RESULTS
Importance of FUBYAS
RJR underscored the importance of the YAS market for the future of the company in a 1983 analysis: "Appeal to younger adults is critical for long term brand growth. Brands that attract 18–24 year olds grow in total. Brands losing appeal among younger adults decline in total." Among the YAS segment the most important group was the YAS choosing a first regular brand, called the "first usual brand younger adult smoker" (FUBYAS). In 1974, RJR had turned its attention to the process by which younger smokers choose an initial brand for regular use with a memorandum titled "What causes smokers to select their first brand of cigarette?". The memo observed that more than half of all male smokers begin smoking before the age of 18 years, and 95% begin before the age of 25. Selection of a first brand for these younger smokers gravitated towards market dominant brands such as Marlboro and Kool, perpetuating share growth. The origins of this brand dominance appeared to be based on "...influential young smokers (perhaps relatively few) [who] have made brand selections based on product characteristics or advertising and promotion communication." These observations, suggesting that successful appeal to first time smokers will in part reflect product characteristics, anticipated RJR's decline in market share throughout the 1970s due to products that failed to appeal to younger smokers.
Further research by RJR in the late 1980s supports these findings: “All major brands in the cigarette market in the last 50 years successfully attracted FUBYAS”. A successful first brand produces dramatic growth through its ability to attract young smokers who remain loyal to the brand over time and significantly increase consumption as they age. This was most famously true in the case of Marlboro: "Marlboro's dynamic growth is due solely to its gains as a successful first brand which significantly overcomes the net switching losses that the brand incurs." Other successful major brands were shown to have followed a similar pattern, including Pall Mall, Winston, Kool, and Newport. "There have only been five major cigarette brands which benefitted from the FUB dynamic during the past 50 years. In fact, FUBYAS played some role in creating all the major brands that have developed in the business." In each of these cases market dominance was first established among YAS, which then translated to dominance in the greater market. As these brands lost touch with the YAS market, their share gradually diminished.

Mexico

Public organizations require Mexico to expel from the country the foreign tobacco companies January 28, 2006 (ITAR-TASS). Breaking an agreement with the company's "Philip Morris" and "British American Tobacco", collaborate in the development of addiction of cigarettes, demanded that Mexican authorities several public organizations of this country. According to the activists, the activities of foreign firms, based on a document dated 2004, is a "bad example" for the Latin American States and runs counter to the efforts of the World Health Organization on tobacco control. Furthermore, the conditions for the intervention of transnational companies in tax and sanitary policies pursued by Mexico. "We urge the authorities to admit that they are victims of transnational producers of cigarettes and should cancel all agreements with them," - said at a press conference doctor Francisco Lopes, the head of the organization "Mexico without tobacco". He added that under the agreement two years ago, companies pay no taxes. They only make contributions to the fund involved treating diseases that are not a consequence of smoking. Moreover, foreigners continue to advertise their harmful products. According to statistics of the Inter-American Foundation for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, Mexico spends about 3 billion of dollars to rid their smokers from chronic ailments. However, receives less than half of that amount in taxes to pay tobacco producers. "As for the companies of Great Britain and the United States, they are simply deceiving the Mexican authorities to use for its own purposes agreement dangerous to the public health and economy of the country" - said Uruguayan representative of the fund specialist Eduardo Bianco. According to his data, from diseases caused by products that foreign firms, 11 thousand die every day people in the world and 165 people in Mexico.

Smoke: A Global History of Smoking

This remarkable collection of over 30 essays makes its first impact for two reasons. Firstly, it is beautifully produced and profusely illustrated, while being marketed at a reasonable price. The publishers deserve praise for this increasingly rare event in hardback publishing. Secondly—and one must take this to be an editorial decision—the focus of the collection is the history, not of tobacco or opium, but of smoke and smoking. This simple maneuver opens up what can only be called a cultural universe, one with its origins in the earliest known history of humankind and which takes us right up to current debates about very modern objects and their uses: the cigarette and its alleged dangers or the recent fashion for smoking rocks of cocaine, now of course called "crack."
As a result, the central importance of smoking in all cultures and the highly complex and differing practices and meanings behind smoking are wonderfully displayed. Smoking as religious ritual; smoking as a possible source of medical healing in early modern Europe; smoking as pleasure, especially in groups—all receive attention. And this is where the illustrations and the photographs play such a vital part, providing amazing examples of artifacts (pipes, above all), places (the opium den, the cocktail bar), and icons who almost are their cigarettes or their cigars (Bogart, Dietrich, Castro). Text and illustrations blend perfectly.
Thanks to Herodotus we are told of ancient Scythians howling with pleasure after throwing hemp seeds on hot stones and inhaling. We note that "the ancient Mayas were passionate smokers and so were their gods." We are educated in the varying and important history of women and smoking, especially of cigarettes. These were a sign of emancipation, often sexual, and a sign of suffrage in late nineteenth century Europe but on the other hand were a sign of domestic enslavement in modernizing China, a practice to be ended for a healthy future. At least in theory: Chinese men, especially under Communism, were actively encouraged to smoke, and eventually sex barriers collapsed and now everyone in China smokes. As one of the coeditors, Zhou Xun, puts it in her essay on the topic, "Smoking is a necessary part of being professional, since business can rarely be carried out without an exchange of cigarettes."
The variety of topics covered in this volume and the number of contributors make it difficult to single out particular contributors. Suffice it to say that it augurs well when both editors contribute excellent pieces. As well as Zhou Xun's essay, that by Sander Gilman on Jews and smoking looks at the historical association between Jews and the tobacco industry as well as the growth of racist accounts of "Eastern" Jewish susceptibility to tobacco poisoning and nervous illness. We also get, of course, Freud and his (probably fatal) cigar. Gilman has a light touch in highlighting the phallic aspects of the cigar and Freud: "Without it, he ceased to be a complete human being." But all contributors find their individual voice, happily housed within sections concentrating on history, artistic and literary representations, gender, ethnicity, and—the big modern dilemma—the burning issue of why it is so hard to stop.
Clay pipes or expensive silver pipes; smoking as a pleasure for the elite but not one to be extended to the laboring masses without careful consideration; smoking and advertising and billions of dollars (and some fine advertisements); the post-coital cigarette; smoking and death (the work of Richard Doll and successors): it is all here, with much else besides.
It is a real pleasure to recommend a book of true anthropological range and seriousness, conjuring, like the perfect smoke ring, the history of a universal human practice at a time when the issues raised (discussed in the final chapters) are at the forefront of current world-wide debates on health policy and social safety.

THE SINNERS

They say the devil's got the best tunes. His share portfolio isn't too bad either. As the market teeters on the verge of recovery, his investments are performing nicely. Tobacco and arms companies are enjoying a field day.
But that doesn't stop them being scrutinized by a range of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and City fund managers.
Following is The Observer's first saints and sinners index - an appraisal of Britain's best and worst ethical companies.
We used Morley Fund Management's Socially Responsible Investment matrix, which assesses business sustainability and combines it with management, vision and opportunities.
We also received research gathered by the UK's Ethical Consumer Association, looking at the social and environmental records of the companies behind the brand names.

THE SINNERS
British American Tobacco: Bat owns a factory in Burma, which is ruled by a brutal military dictatorship. Ken Clarke MP, Bat's deputy chairman, appeared to agree this was not satisfactory in a letter he wrote to a constituent, which recently came to light. He has since clarified his stance and Bat has no plans to stop manufacturing there. Bat stands accused of lobbying governments to water down the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. It is in the midst of multi-billion dollar US litigation over health warning issues associated with smoking. Meanwhile, it has outperformed the FTSE.
BAE Systems: Britain's biggest manufacturer employs 120,000 people worldwide, has annual sales of Ј13.2 billion, underlying profits of Ј1bn, an order book of Ј43.8bn, and supplies customers in 129 countries. It sold Hawk jet fighters and arms to the tyrannical Indonesian government in 1996 and recently earned Ј28m from the debt-stricken Tanzanian government for supplying an air traffic control system. BAE has ambitions to become a global defense contractor.
BP: Sceptics reckon its high-profile media 'green' campaign costs more than BP's renewable spend, which is $500m a year for three years from 2000 out of a total capital expenditure of $36bn. Morley Fund Management says 'dependence on oil exploration and issues surrounding investments in Alaska, Indonesia and Angola ensure the firm gets a low rating on business sustainability'. Its proposed oil pipeline through Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan has exposed it to huge international opposition.
BNFL: Wants to expand the UK's civil nuclear power programme. Its Thorp reprocessing plant in Sellafield will produce an estimated 136,000 cubic meters of nuclear waste within eight years while its Mox fuel plant has created outrage in Ireland over potential radioactive discharges in to the Irish Sea.
GlaxoSmithKline: The world's biggest drug company's Lancashire factory is the third biggest carcinogen-emitting chemical producer, according to Environment Agency statistics for 2001. Meanwhile, its Seroxat anti-depressant drug has allegedly been linked to psychiatric problems and the company has been censured by an industry body for playing down its side-effects. It also wants to award its chief executive a multi-million pound salary. Finally, it has been criticised over its difficulties in distributing affordable life-saving drugs to developing countries.

THE SAINTS
Kingfisher: Top of the pile only for its DIY subsidiary, B&Q. It is phasing peat out of its garden products because of environmental concerns and has led the way on sustainably managed timber.
Body Shop: The health and beauty chain founded by Gordon and Anita Roddick put the issue of testing cosmetics on animals on the high street. It also highlighted Shell's oppression of the Ogoni people in Nigeria and launched the Big Issue and funds environment and human rights groups.
Scottish and Southern Energy: Britain's largest generator from renewable resources with close to 50 per cent of the country's renewable generation capacity.
Go-Ahead Group: Operates buses and trains in the UK. It has been involved in developing alternative fuels and traffic management schemes with local authorities, and in initiatives to provide disabled access to public transport.
MM02: Recently demerged from BT, mm02 is a leader in the mobile phone and internet services market. The company is described as having 'high environmental and social standards' by an environmental unit trust fund.

In Naples have banned smoking in parks

November 20, 2007 (Repubblica). Naples authorities have banned smoking in parks and community gardens, where there are pregnant women and children under the age of 12. Violators threatens a fine of 27 to 500 euros - depending on the distance from where the children were smokers or what month of pregnancy is a woman. The ban came into force on 18 November. In supporting the ban, which is introduced for the first time in Italy, Senator Rino Nasty explained that according approved by the Council of Ministers in February 2007 Agenda for Health, regional authorities can nominate and implement initiatives related to the restriction of action that are harmful to the health of others. In addition, the parks are often used for public events, and similar bans provide attractive growth recreational areas, I am sure Nasty. The ban also endorsed the Italian Health Minister Livia Turco and Minister for the Environment Alfonso Pecoraro Scanio.